Rene Almeling

GUYnecology

Notify me when the book’s added
To read this book, upload an EPUB or FB2 file to Bookmate. How do I upload a book?
For more than a century, the medical profession has made enormous efforts to understand and treat women’s reproductive bodies. But only recently have researchers begun to ask basic questions about how men’s health matters for reproductive outcomes, from miscarriage to childhood illness. What explains this gap in knowledge, and what are its consequences?
Rene Almeling examines the production, circulation, and reception of biomedical knowledge about men’s reproductive health. From a failed nineteenth-century effort to launch a medical specialty called andrology to the contemporary science of paternal effects, there has been a lack of attention to the importance of men’s age, health, and exposures. Analyzing historical documents, media messages, and qualitative interviews, GUYnecology demonstrates how this non-knowledge shapes reproductive politics today.
This book is currently unavailable
419 printed pages
Original publication
2020
Publication year
2020
Have you already read it? How did you like it?
👍👎

Quotes

  • Nast Huertahas quotedlast year
    Cultural beliefs about the biological significance of sex differences—namely, that men and women each contribute biological material to conception but that pregnancy and birth occur primarily in women’s bodies—come together with cultural beliefs about the invulnerability of male bodies to stymie the development of biomedical infrastructure oriented to men’s reproductive health, with enormous implications for both the production and circulation of knowledge as well as how individuals conceptualize reproduction.
  • Nast Huertahas quotedlast year
    just as there has been little biomedical infrastructure for producing new knowledge about men’s reproductive health, there has been little biomedical infrastructure for publicizing that knowledge once it is produced. It is left to individual reporters (often women) reading individual articles written by individual scientists (often women) to generate discussion about how men matter for reproductive outcomes. The result is that new knowledge about paternal effects rarely makes its way to a broader public, and the feedback loop linking women’s bodies and reproduction continues almost wholly unimpeded, loop upon loop.
  • Nast Huertahas quotedlast year
    So perhaps it is not a surprise that to create a page on men’s preconception health, the CDC simply copied its advice for women and changed the pronouns
fb2epub
Drag & drop your files (not more than 5 at once)