The best I can try in this book is the general use of dialogues where the lone intention is arriving at an indisputable truth. Cos...if you fix well in the interviewers, you'll see that the first of them has a latin name whereas the second one is called by a greek name. It's said: They don't meet them, but their civilisations were disputing when they met themselves; so, the product of it is an irreal conversation where the lone result of it is getting conscience of verity. /// Sorry, the themes that Mandeville got used to do dialogue were low interesting enough. So, the most valuable of it usually is the heritage of this literature register by George Berkeley, philosopher and also follower of this imaginative rule.