Niccolò Machiavelli

The Prince

  • juanmanuelliehas quoted2 years ago
    I will leave out all discussion on republics, inasmuch as in another place I have written of them at length, and will address myself only to principalities.

    Chapter 2 (first paragraph)

  • juanmanuelliehas quoted2 years ago
    Such dominions thus acquired are either accustomed to live under a prince, or to live in freedom; and are acquired either by the arms of the prince himself, or of others, or else by fortune or by ability.
  • juanmanuelliehas quoted2 years ago
    Principalities are either hereditary, in which the family has been long established; or they are new.
  • juanmanuelliehas quoted2 years ago
    All states, all powers, that have held and hold rule over men have been and are either republics or principalities.

    Chapter 1 (first paragraph)

  • juanmanuelliehas quoted2 years ago
    "Quis eo fuit unquam in partiundis rebus, in definiendis, in explanandis pressior?" In "The Prince," it may be truly said, there is reason assignable, not only for every word, but for the position of every word.
  • juanmanuelliehas quoted2 years ago
    Then—to pass to a higher plane—Machiavelli reiterates that, although crimes may win an empire, they do not win glory. Necessary wars are just wars, and the arms of a nation are hallowed when it has no other resource but to fight.
  • juanmanuelliehas quoted2 years ago
    Men are still the dupes of their simplicity and greed, as they were in the days of Alexander VI.
  • juanmanuelliehas quoted2 years ago
    "The Prince," its problems are still debatable and interesting, because they are the eternal problems between the ruled and their rulers.
  • juanmanuelliehas quoted2 years ago
    Machiavelli was undoubtedly a man of great observation, acuteness, and industry; noting with appreciative eye whatever passed before him, and with his supreme literary gift turning it to account in his enforced retirement from affairs. He does not present himself, nor is he depicted by his contemporaries, as a type of that rare combination, the successful statesman and author, for he appears to have been only moderately prosperous in his several embassies and political employments.
  • juanmanuelliehas quoted2 years ago
    The "little book" suffered many vicissitudes before attaining the form in which it has reached us. Various mental influences were at work during its composition; its title and patron were changed; and for some unknown reason it was finally dedicated to Lorenzo de' Medici. Although Machiavelli discussed with Casavecchio whether it should be sent or presented in person to the patron, there is no evidence that Lorenzo ever received or even read it: he certainly never gave Machiavelli any employment. Although it was plagiarized during Machiavelli's lifetime, "The Prince" was never published by him, and its text is still disputable.
fb2epub
Drag & drop your files (not more than 5 at once)