Books
Emmeline Pankhurst

Freedom or death

In “Freedom or Death,” Emmeline Pankhurst offers a fiery and impassioned treatise on the struggle for women's suffrage in early 20th century Britain. The book is a blend of memoir and political manifesto, characterized by its direct prose and emotional fervor. Pankhurst's use of vivid anecdotes serves to illustrate the personal and societal stakes involved in the suffragette movement. Set against the backdrop of a patriarchal society that dismisses women's voices, her work captures the urgency and desperation of the campaign, making a compelling argument for moral and political equality. The literary style reflects the tumultuous context of the suffrage movement, utilizing persuasive rhetoric that galvanizes support for the cause while also illuminating the sacrifices made by countless women. Emmeline Pankhurst, a prominent suffragist and founder of the Women's Social and Political Union (WSPU), was deeply influenced by her experiences as a woman in a male-dominated society. Her relentless activism came at great personal cost, including imprisonment and the loss of her family life. Driven by a profound desire for justice and equality, Pankhurst'Äôs personal narrative infuses her writing with authenticity and urgency, connecting her experiences to the broader feminist struggle of the time. “Freedom or Death” is an essential read for anyone interested in the history of civil rights, feminism, and social change. Pankhurst'Äôs passionate cry for justice not only resonates with contemporary themes of empowerment but also serves as an inspiring call to action. Engaging and thought-provoking, the book invites readers to confront the ongoing fight for equality, making it a compelling addition to any scholarly exploration of women's rights.
53 printed pages
Copyright owner
Bookwire
Original publication
2020
Publication year
2020
Publisher
Good Press
Have you already read it? How did you like it?
👍👎

Quotes

  • Dariahas quoted4 years ago
    It is only people who feel an intolerable sense of oppression who would adopt a means of that kind. I know of no people who did it before us except revolutionaries in Russia - who adopted the hunger strike against intolerable prison conditions.
  • Dariahas quoted4 years ago
    sympathy is a very unsatisfactory thing if it is not practical sympathy
  • Dariahas quoted4 years ago
    Why should we alienate the sympathy of the shopkeepers? Well, there is the other side of the question, gentlemen - why should the shopkeepers alienate the sympathy of their customers by refusing to help them to get political power, some power to make the condition of the woman who helps to earn the shopkeepers money by serving in his shop, easier than it is at the present time? Those women broke shopkeepers' windows, and what was the situation? Just at the beginning of the winter season when all the new winter hats and coats were being shown, the shopkeepers had to barricade all their windows with wood and nobody could see the new winter fashions. Well, there again is an impossible situation. The shopkeeper cannot afford to quarrel with his customers, and we have today far more practical sympathy amongst the shopkeepers of London than we ever had when we were quiet, gentle, ladylike suffragists asking nicely for a vote.
fb2epub
Drag & drop your files (not more than 5 at once)