Free
Thorstein Veblen

The Theory of the Leisure Class

  • Дашаhas quoted4 years ago
    (2) subsistence must be obtainable on sufficiently easy terms to admit of the exemption of a considerable portion of the community from steady application to a routine of labour.
  • Дашаhas quoted4 years ago
    The conditions apparently necessary to its emergence in a consistent form are: (1) the community must be of a predatory habit of life
  • Ekaterina Kolesnikhas quoted4 years ago
    practice of seizing women from the enemy as trophies, gave rise to a form of ownership-marriage, resulting in a household with a male head
  • Ekaterina Kolesnikhas quoted4 years ago
    Likewise the earliest form of ownership is an ownership of the women by the able bodied men of the community.
  • Ekaterina Kolesnikhas quoted4 years ago
    the change of standards and points of view is gradual only, and it seldom results in the subversion or entire suppression of a standpoint once accepted
  • Ekaterina Kolesnikhas quoted4 years ago
    The institution of leisure class is the outgrowth of an early discrimination between employments, according to which some employments are worthy and others unworthy.
  • Ekaterina Kolesnikhas quoted4 years ago
    His work may conduce to the maintenance of the group, but it is felt that it does so through an excellence and an efficacy of a kind that cannot without derogation be compared with the uneventful diligence of the women.
  • Ekaterina Kolesnikhas quoted4 years ago
    If there are several grades of aristocracy, the women of high rank are commonly exempt from industrial employment, or at least from the more vulgar kinds of manual labour. The men of the upper classes are not only exempt, but by prescriptive custom they are debarred, from all industrial occupations
  • Alexandra Maniovichhas quoted4 years ago
    Hand labor is a more wasteful method of production; hence the goods turned out by this method are more serviceable for the purpose of pecuniary reputability; hence the marks of hand labor come to be honorific, and the goods which exhibit these marks take rank as of higher grade than the corresponding machine product. Commonly, if not invariably, the honorific marks of hand labor are certain imperfections and irregularities in the lines of the hand-wrought article, showing where the workman has fallen short in the execution of the design. The ground of the superiority of hand-wrought goods, therefore, is a certain margin of crudeness. This margin must never be so wide as to show bungling workmanship, since that would be evidence of low cost, nor so narrow as to suggest the ideal precision attained only by the machine, for that would be evidence of low cost.
  • Alexandra Maniovichhas quoted4 years ago
    They usually give evidence of skill and effective workmanship, even if they do not contribute to the substantial serviceability of the goods; and it is no doubt largely on some such ground that any particular mark of honorific serviceability first comes into vogue and afterward maintains its footing as a normal constituent element of the worth of an article. A display of efficient workmanship is pleasing simply as such, even where its remoter, for the time unconsidered, outcome is futile. There is a gratification of the artistic sense in the contemplation of skillful work. But it is also to be added that no such evidence of skillful workmanship, or of ingenious and effective adaptation of means to an end, will, in the long run, enjoy the approbation of the modern civilized consumer unless it has the sanction of the Canon of conspicuous waste.
fb2epub
Drag & drop your files (not more than 5 at once)