- b6221027333has quoted8 months ago
The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. - b6221027333has quoted8 months agoLet the ruling classes tremble at a communist revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win.
WORKERS OF ALL COUNTRIES, UNITE! - Coffeehas quotedlast year
The bourgeoisie has stripped of its halo every occupation hitherto honored and looked up to with reverent awe. It has converted the physician, the lawyer, the priest, the poet, the man of science, into its paid wage laborers. - pendeltonward101has quoted2 months ago
The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles. - 302 Rizvi Khadijahas quoted2 years ago
This argument may appear over subtle and refined; but is not in reality different from the reasoning of a judge, who supposes, that the credit of two witnesses, maintaining a crime against any one, is destroyed by the testimony of two others, who affirm him to have been two hundred leagues distant, at the same instant when the crime is said to have been committed.so like we cannot/ should not hold the miracles in any regard of one religion because its is very well possible that in trying to establish the foundation for their system, they will try to refute others.. but in doing so they have done it themselves.. i guess?
- 302 Rizvi Khadijahas quoted2 years agoSuppose that the Caesarean and Pompeian factions had, each of them, claimed the victory in these battles, and that the historians of each party had uniformly ascribed the advantage to their own side; how could mankind, at this distance, have been able to determine between them?
history and historians are just as subjecive as he next person.. if both sides are writing and glorifying their own faction how are we to know who's won?
- 302 Rizvi Khadijahas quoted2 years agoavidum genus auricularum
mankind is greedy for lies
- 302 Rizvi Khadijahas quoted2 years agoUpon the whole, then, it appears, that no testimony for any kind of miracle has ever amounted to a probability, much less to a proof; and that, even supposing it amounted to a proof, it would be opposed by another proof; derived from the very nature of the fact, which it would endeavour to establish. It is experience only, which gives authority to human testimony; and it is the same experience, which assures us of the laws of nature.
- 302 Rizvi Khadijahas quoted2 years agoThe decay, corruption, and dissolution of nature, is an event rendered probable by so many analogies, that any phenomenon, which seems to have a tendency towards that catastrophe, comes within the reach of human testimony, if that testimony be very extensive and uniform
hmmm not sure what u mean bbg
- 302 Rizvi Khadijahas quoted2 years agoAll this might astonish me; but I would still reply, that the knavery and folly of men are such common phenomena, that I should rather believe the most extraordinary events to arise from their concurrence, than admit of so signal a violation of the laws of nature.
bro beleives in the laws of nature very firmly
fb2epub
Drag & drop your files
(not more than 5 at once)